Tariff extension signals tough road ahead in US-China talks: Peter Cardillo
Peter Cardillo
, Spartan Capital Securities.
What do you make of the latest announcement from Trump, where he has extended the deadline to impose additional tariffs on China by 90 days? What does this mean for other economies, especially India, where additional tariffs have been levied?
Peter Cardillo:
Well, it basically puts everything back on hold. It gives the markets more time to assess what may or may not happen with China and India as well. It's Trump flipping again, which indicates that China is a tough negotiator. In one respect, that's good news. In another, it's not—because we still don't know how this is going to end. Obviously, the markets are beginning to realise that every time Trump blinks or changes his mind, it just adds another big question mark. As for today's market, I don't think this move will have much impact. The major focus will be on the inflation data.
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals
By Vaibhav Sisinity
View Program
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals Batch 2
By Ansh Mehra
View Program
You just mentioned that the major focus will be on the inflation data due later today for the US markets. Earlier, you said that even a baseline tariff of 10–15% would be inflationary for the US. But now, tariffs—nearly 40% in some cases—have come into play. How do you see all this panning out, especially for the US consumer, who will ultimately pay more if higher import duties are imposed?
Peter Cardillo:
Absolutely. Even if you get a baseline inflation impact of 10%, and so far, it has been around 15%, let's assume the average will be somewhere between 10% and 15%—it's still inflationary. It's not going to send inflation through the roof, but it will keep it elevated. And once again, we're going to see that in today's numbers. We're expecting headline inflation to rise by 0.3%, and the key will be core inflation, which we also expect to increase by 0.3%. On a yearly basis, it's very possible that core inflation could tick back up to 3%. That would confirm that tariffs are keeping inflation elevated and that the American consumer is the one paying the price.
Live Events
Since we're talking about inflation, in this backdrop, what are you expecting from the Federal Reserve's meeting in September? There are hopes that the Fed could cut rates—possibly twice—for the rest of this calendar year. What's your estimate?
Peter Cardillo:
We will get rate cuts—there's no doubt about that. The economy has slowed, and it's slowing rather quickly, as we saw with the employment numbers. Of course, it's not a good combination to see the economy slow while inflation rises—that's a sign of stagflation. But they will act. I think we'll get some insight into this at the Jackson Hole meeting on August 21–23. If the September labour market data comes in much weaker—or shows negative jobs growth—the Fed may be forced to cut by 50 basis points in one go, instead of two 25-basis-point cuts. That could be enough for the rest of the year. However, there's another issue: do the markets really trust the macro data?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
12 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Swiss gold industry warns against Swatch boss's US gold tax proposal
Synopsis Following U.S. tariffs on Swiss goods, Swatch CEO Nick Hayek proposed a retaliatory export tax on Swiss gold bars destined for the United States. However, the Swiss Association of Manufacturers and Traders in Precious Metals expressed skepticism, fearing economic harm and damage to Switzerland's reputation as a free trade advocate. Reuters Gold bullion bars (file photo) Switzerland's gold industry on Thursday voiced skepticism about a proposal by the boss of watchmaker Swatch to introduce a levy on gold exports to the United States in retaliation for U.S. tariffs on Switzerland. U.S. President Donald Trump last week imposed tariffs of 39% on imported Swiss goods, causing shock and dismay in the Alpine republic, a major refining and transit hub for gold. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection afterwards said Washington might put tariffs on the most widely-traded gold bullion bars in the United States. However, Trump said on Monday that gold would not face tariffs. Swatch CEO Nick Hayek told Swiss newspaper Blick that Trump's announcement indicated that tariffs on gold would be painful for the U.S. president. "Now is the time to go on the offensive. Switzerland should order a 39% export tax on gold bars for the United States," Hayek told the paper. "That's where we have to get at him. That's his Achilles' heel." The Swiss Association of Manufacturers and Traders in Precious Metals (ASFCMP) said that while ideas to better balance bilateral trade were welcome, careful consideration needed to be given to Switzerland's longer-term interests. "An export tax on Swiss gold destined for the USA would not only harm Switzerland economically, but also damage the reputation of a country that has consistently promoted and defended free trade," ASFCMP President Christoph Wild said. The Swiss Economy Ministry declined to comment on the proposal, but said the support of business representatives was in general welcome and helped underscore the close economic ties between the U.S. and Switzerland. Trump justified his 39% tariff by pointing to Switzerland's sizeable trade surplus with the United States. Part of that is due to gold exports. Hayek said that even if a gold levy failed to move Trump, it would cut the U.S. trade deficit with Switzerland. "If Trump doesn't give in to our pressure, we'll at least improve the trade balance with the U.S. if the Americans no longer import gold bars via Switzerland," he told Blick. Switzerland is continuing to hold talks with U.S. officials aimed at lowering the U.S. tariffs.
Mint
12 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump's crypto cheer lifts Bitcoin, but core risks still loom
The cryptocurrency faithful are having quite a moment. Donald Trump's return to the White House has brought a veritable cornucopia of pro-crypto promises, from talk of a 'Strategic Bitcoin Reserve" to declarations about making America the 'crypto capital of the world." Markets have reacted predictably: Bitcoin has surged past previous highs, and believers are treating this as ultimate vindication. Yet beneath the sheen of political legitimacy, nothing fundamental has changed about cryptocurrencies' essential nature. The irony in Trump's embrace of crypto is hard to miss. The proposed 'Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and US Digital Asset Stockpile" will apparently consist entirely of assets seized from criminals. In other words, the US government's official cryptocurrency holdings will be digital assets once used for ransomware, money laundering, drug trafficking, and other illicit activities. It's rather like announcing a strategic reserve of stolen goods as proof of their virtue. This detail neatly captures crypto's central problem. Despite all the technological sophistication and political endorsements, it remains the payment method of choice for criminals worldwide. Every major ransomware attack, dark web marketplace, and cross-border money laundering network gravitates to crypto for the same reasons enthusiasts celebrate it—anonymity, irreversibility, and freedom from traditional oversight. Political enthusiasm can't fix these structural flaws. Governments seeking to legitimise crypto are, in effect, blessing a system designed to bypass governmental authority. The contradiction is glaring: regulators tout an asset class while acknowledging that their strategic reserves will be filled mainly by seizing it from criminals. The ease with which fraud and theft occur in crypto remains staggering. Consider the 'socialised loss" strategy, where a major Indian exchange, after losing customer funds to hackers, decided everyone should share the pain, a perfect example of the Wild West ethos. When exchanges profit, it's capitalism; when they're robbed, suddenly everyone's a socialist. The frequency of such episodes would be comical if they didn't wipe out life savings. These aren't isolated mishaps or growing pains; they're built into a system that operates outside traditional financial protections. When a bank is robbed, deposit insurance protects you. When a crypto exchange is 'hacked", often a euphemism, you're on your own. The very decentralisation crypto champions means there's no safety net when things go wrong. Trump's enthusiasm also underlines another uncomfortable reality: an anti-establishment movement has been fully co-opted by the establishment it once vowed to disrupt. Wall Street, which Bitcoin was meant to circumvent, is now its biggest backer via ETFs and institutional products. The so-called revolutionary currency depends on the same traditional finance for its legitimacy. Political endorsement carries psychological weight. When governments and big institutions adopt a position, it creates an illusion of safety and permanence. Past crypto bubbles fed on tech mystique and get-rich-quick dreams; this cycle adds political validation, which could make it more dangerous for ordinary investors mistaking political backing for sound investment. For Indian investors, the temptation to chase this apparent legitimacy will be strong. Domestic taxation has curbed much local speculation, but political developments in the US could encourage some to seek workarounds. The 'don't miss out" narrative, wrapped in patriotic American rhetoric about financial dominance, could be persuasive. Yet the math hasn't changed. Crypto produces nothing, earns nothing, and represents no underlying asset. It serves no economic purpose that existing systems can't fulfil more efficiently. Its price is driven purely by speculative sentiment, whether fuelled by tech hype, celebrity endorsements, or presidential tweets. The most telling part of crypto's political embrace is how quickly its advocates abandoned anti-government principles in exchange for government approval. Those who once railed against fiat currencies and central banks now cheer politicians promising to hoard their preferred tokens. It's a striking shift from revolutionary idealism to conventional rent-seeking. Short-term price predictions are futile, speculative bubbles can inflate far beyond reason. But knowing what you're buying matters. Political theatre and presidential applause can't turn speculation into investment, gambling into wealth-building, or criminal infrastructure into legitimate finance. However much hot air gets pumped into this bubble, the fundamentals remain unchanged. Dhirendra Kumar is founder and chief executive officer of Value Research, an independent advisory firm. Views expressed are personal.
Economic Times
12 minutes ago
- Economic Times
India's trade deficit rises to $27.35 billion in July from $18.78 billion in June
India's merchandise trade deficit significantly widened to $27.35 billion in July, a sharp increase from June's $18.78 billion, as exports declined to $37.24 billion and imports rose to $64.59 billion. This deterioration occurs amidst renewed challenges for Indian exporters, particularly concerning President Trump's proposed tariffs on Indian goods, potentially taking effect later this month. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads India's merchandise trade deficit widened to $27.35 billion in July, up sharply from $18.78 billion in June, provisional commerce ministry data showed on shipments rose 8.6% year-on-year to $64.59 billion, while outbound shipments stood at $37.24 billion, up 7.3%. Economists polled by Reuters had expected the deficit to reach $20.35 widening gap comes as Indian exporters face renewed pressure from the United States, with President Donald Trump's proposed 25% additional tariff on Indian goods scheduled for August 27, unless a deal is reached during the ongoing 21-day negotiation comparison, India's trade deficit had narrowed to $18.78 billion in June from $21.88 billion in May, with exports roughly flat at $35.14 billion and imports down 3.7% from the previous year.
