Kevin Feige Confirms Marvel's Next Big Move and Teases Three More Phases Coming — GeekTyrant
Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige has confirmed that the studio is already hard at work mapping out the future of the MCU, and it's going to be massive.
Feige recently revealed that Marvel isn't just planning the next phase, they're planning an entire saga. For those keeping track, that means three more phases are on the way. Feige said:
'I mean, we're working on the next… A saga's three phases, so we're working on the next three right now. But really, the first one of the next saga is directly impacted by what we're doing right now with these movies and Secret Wars.'
So, where does that leave us? The current Multiverse Saga wraps with Avengers: Secret Wars in 2027, and according to Feige, Marvel has a seven-year plan that stretches all the way to 2032.
That means Phase 7, and probably beyond, is already being sketched out behind the scenes. This long-term roadmap likely includes major projects fans have been waiting for, like the introduction of the X-Men into the MCU.
One of the biggest questions fans have had is whether all those Multiverse Saga post-credit teases, like Harry Styles as Eros and the debut of Hercules, will pay off.
Feige addressed this saying:
'There are plans for some and there are opportunities for all. It's about finding what the right… what the right moment is. Some maybe we'll never see again.
'Some maybe we'll see soon. Some maybe it'll be like Tim Blake Nelson, you know, 17 years in between. Who knows?
'What I love about it is it's as much about the actors as it is about the characters. It's as much about our enthusiasm, excitement to work with those actors, which is how almost all those came about, but to see where they go.
'But we will not alter a storyline just to include them simply because they have been seen in the past.'
So, just because a character pops up in a post-credit scene doesn't mean they're guaranteed a major role anytime soon. Marvel is prioritizing story over fan service? But, they introduced them in the first place, so it's their own fault that these characters are just left hanging.
Feige also touched on something that will make longtime fans raise an eyebrow: recasting classic characters like Iron Man. While it's not happening tomorrow, the idea is very much on the table:
Marvel wants these iconic characters to live on, even if that means new actors stepping into legendary roles. Whether that happens in the next saga or way down the line remains to be seen, but it's clear Marvel sees the MCU as an ever-evolving universe rather than a closed book.
Look, Marvel Studios isn't going anywhere. With plans reaching into the early 2030s, three brand-new phases on the horizon, and the promise of new sagas shaping the future of the MCU, fans are looking at at least another decade of superhero storytelling.
The next saga officially kicks off after Secret Wars , and while Feige isn't revealing details yet the MCU's future is going to be just as ambitious, interconnected, and surprising as ever.
What do you want to see in Marvel's next saga?
Souce: CB
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
8 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Kevin Feige Teases a Major ‘Avengers: Doomsday' Location
'The fun of an Avengers movie is introducing people to each other and seeing how very different personalities get along,' says Kevin Feige, the president of Marvel Studios. 'In the case of a movie that involves the threat of worlds literally colliding, it's fun to see them visit each other's homes.' Feige was speaking to the official Marvel website about The Fantastic Four: First Steps, which is now in theaters. It's the final piece of the puzzle before Avengers: Doomsday comes out in December 2026, and Feige confirmed that the home of the Fantastic Four won't just play a role; it'll be a central meeting spot for Earth's Mightiest Heroes. 'With the Baxter Building set, let's say it had four or five people in it at most in the Fantastic Four movie. And it's got a heck of a lot more people in it [in Doomsday],' Feige said. 'It's a thrill to see that interaction. And it's surreal for me, who's been around for 25 years.' So now we know that several Avengers, or potentially their nemeses, are going to be all together in the Baxter Building. But this raises some questions, does it not? The Baxter Building as seen in Fantastic Four exists on Earth 828, the home of the Fantastic Four. In that multiverse/timeline/dimension, the Fantastic Four are the only superheroes. So, presuming Reed Richards doesn't build a second Baxter Building, it seems that other heroes from Marvel will travel to that timeline. How does that happen? Who is able to do that? Why do they do that? Is all the action in the film on Earth 828 but not Earth 616, the home of the traditional MCU, which includes Captain America, the Thunderbolts, Thor, and more? That might make sense, as we presume 828 is where Doctor Doom is from, as seen in the end credits of Fantastic Four. But surely he has more on his mind than just this one universe. Adding to the mystery is the other piece of the Doomsday puzzle we have. That the Thunderbolts saw a ship with a giant '4' on it enter space around Earth 616. So, is that before all this? After? We don't know. What we do know, for a fact now, is that multiple characters in Avengers: Doomsday will convene in the Baxter Building of the Fantastic Four. Let the speculation begin. The Fantastic Four: First Steps is now in theaters. Avengers: Doomsday is now filming and will be released December 18, 2026. Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what's next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.
Gizmodo
38 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
‘Thunderbolts' Director Teases His Take on the ‘Complex' X-Men
While Marvel basks in the success of The Fantastic Four: First Steps, director Jake Schreier—the guiding hand behind Marvel's earlier 2025 hit, Thunderbolts—is looking ahead to the studio's most anticipated movie that doesn't have the word 'Avengers' in the title. Schreier is helming the movie designed to bring the X-Men fully into the Marvel Cinematic Universe, on the heels of Deadpool & Wolverine. As you'd expect, he's giving his approach to the oft-adapted characters a lot of thought. Speaking to the Playlist (and keeping things in Marvel-approved non-spoilery terms), Schreier said that his movie's take on the X-Men will be quite different than what fans have seen before. Of course, he couldn't elaborate more on that, but his comments suggest the departure will come not with the movie's aesthetics but with a new approach to the emotional arcs of its famously conflicted mutants. 'To be able to explore all of the ideas that are inherent to that rich source material, but also at the scale inherent to the source material, that's like a very rare and fortunate opportunity. That's very exciting.' Schreier also called the project 'an incredible opportunity with super interesting characters and [much] internal conflict. These characters are wrestling with their identity and place in the world—that's inherently interesting and complex material.' In the same Playlist piece, Marvel boss Kevin Feige was quoted as calling Schreier's X-Men a 'youth-focused reboot' in terms of both casting and 'tone and perspective.' Details about the new X-Men movie are understandably scarce at the moment; it does not have a release date set, though the MCU has its trajectory mapped out through 2026 (Spider-Man: Brand New Day; Avengers: Doomsday) and 2027 (Avengers: Secret Wars). Characters from the Fox X-Men movies, released prior to Marvel parent company Disney's acquisition of the characters in 2019, are expected to appear in those two Avengers films, with Schreier's reboot coming after. Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what's next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Superman gets a big, blue reboot that supercharges a beleaguered genre
When fear, anger, and cynicism feel like the default, a superhero movie that presents its splash-page havoc with guileless warmth and zero irony is a rare and precious thing. Sam Raimi's Spider-Man swung into theaters in 2002, setting a gold standard for superhero movies while thrilling post-9/11 audiences burdened by imminent war. Now, like a bolt from the blue comes James Gunn's Superman, a rowdy and vivid film that knocks the doldrums out of the beleaguered superhero genre with the kind of two-fisted brio any self-respecting comic hero deserves—and it arrives not a moment too soon. After leaving Marvel Studios (as its post-Endgame implosion continues), Gunn has revitalized the DC Universe in the wake of the evaporated prospects of Aquaman And The Lost Kingdom, Shazam! Fury Of The Gods, and Black Adam. Superman, the first installment in this new era, is set in a resonant, lived-in, and inviting world, while still delivering the franchise set-up goods that Warner Bros. is undoubtedly banking on. It sits on the same shelf as Spider-Man (without, perhaps, the dizzying heights of Spider-Man 2), a joyful and consistently exciting adventure of the Saturday morning variety that shares the keenly felt emotions of Gunn's Guardians Of The Galaxy, a film he made when his freak-flag sensibilities could still fly under the radar of studio expectations. With Superman, Gunn steps into an untested phase of his career, operating under closer scrutiny and much bigger stakes. And yet, this unlikely apotheosis from the Troma-trained enfant terrible hasn't blunted Gunn's directorial edge. If anything, his subject has only steeled his resolve as a provocateur and champion of the oddball. After Christopher Reeve's lauded tenure, the dour Superman Returns, and Zack Snyder's bleak revisionism, Superman has been in desperate need of a storyteller who embraces the outsider perspective that has been central to the character for nearly a century. Gunn reasserts DC's strange visitor from a doomed planet in a front-and-center immigrant narrative that interrogates 'the American Way' as it exists today. His hero takes a firm stance on the side of the marginalized in open defiance of those who step over them for personal gain—or, in the case of the film's billionaire villain, Lex Luthor (Nicholas Hoult), to satisfy a vendetta against the Other that's as narrow-minded as it is petty. In this Other, Superman finds its center: David Corenswet, a Juilliard-trained actor (like Reeve before him) who until now was largely known for boosting supporting roles in films like Pearl and Twisters. With his striking, searching blue eyes and large build, Corenswet contrasts Hoult's belligerent Luthor with a provincial warmth both quintessentially dopey yet oddly new. (Only this Superman could sell an endearing clunker like 'What the hey, dude?') And Gunn keeps his star busy. If Superman isn't mitigating Luthor's 5-D death traps, he's clumsily grappling with the realpolitik of the fictional warring nations Boravia and Jarhanpur, staying sanguine about his rambunctious foster dog, Krypto, and navigating a tenuous situationship with Lois Lane (a brassy Rachel Brosnahan). Whether Corenswet is locked in a sub-dimensional prison cell with the weepy Metamorpho (Anthony Carrigan) or fielding a tense on-the-record interview with the Daily Planet's top investigative reporter, he plants Superman's feet squarely in the side of right over might. This righteousness comes at a cost. Compared to the character's more traditional depictions, Gunn's Superman is more physically and emotionally vulnerable; more than Kryptonite or even Luthor, Superman's biggest threat is doubt. He wrestles with what it means to do the right thing in a world increasingly suspicious of do-gooders, and his moral compass, while true, can wobble. Gunn leverages these emotionally tricky moments well by countering Superman's epiphanies with all sorts of peril. Inevitably, someone flashes a chunk of Kryptonite, which turns his knees to jelly and his skin into Frank Quitely-esque cottage cheese. In his very first moments, he's plummeting to earth, coughing up blood, and looking like he just caught one hell of a beating. From the jump, Gunn makes one thing clear: This is a Superman we can't take for granted. Luckily for him, Superman maintains a strong but largely peripheral supporting bench: Nathan Fillion's aggressively unpleasant Green Lantern, Guy Gardner; Isabela Merced's screeching Hawkgirl; and Edi Gathegi's Mr. Terrific, easily the film's standout, a smooth 'been there, hacked that' techie primed to lead his own ensemble. This influx of characters, few of whom carry meaningful subplots beyond comic relief or a flashy action setpiece—Brosnahan's Lois rightfully gets the most to do, though Skyler Gisondo's Jimmy Olsen brings a smarmy energy to the cub reporter—can pull focus from the lead. It's here where Superman operates less like a solo story and more like a crowded team-up. The film's narrative threads converge gradually, the film in a constant state of building toward its third act. In these stretches, Superman all but disappears, leaving a vacuum in a would-be franchise still actively establishing its identity. Yet Gunn eventually finds his footing and Superman returns to the fray, delivering heat vision reprisals and truth and justice platitudes to Luthor's hostile forces (he leads a sycophantic science outfit that resembles DOGE gone berserk). Superman's bromides can feel old-fashioned and will certainly be viewed as cornball by the deeper cynics out there. But there's something resolutely sincere and bracing about this Man Of Steel's farmboy optimism in a time when earnestness gets the finger and moral clarity is in short supply. Superman delivers a simple, potent message: You don't need X-ray vision to see people as people. Director: James Gunn Writer: James Gunn Starring: David Corenswet, Rachel Brosnahan, Nicholas Hoult, Edi Gathegi, Anthony Carrigan, Nathan Fillion, Isabela Merced Release Date: July 11, 2025 More from A.V. Club Murderbot ends on notes of melodrama and melancholy Nacho Vigalondo retreats to an unimaginative dream world for Daniela Forever David Zaslav reportedly "dismissed" a Black Superman movie for being "too woke" Solve the daily Crossword
