logo
The holiday car hire firm ‘stealing £1,000s from Brits with bullying tactics' as horrified tourists ‘assaulted' by staff

The holiday car hire firm ‘stealing £1,000s from Brits with bullying tactics' as horrified tourists ‘assaulted' by staff

Scottish Sun17 hours ago
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
CUT-PRICE car rentals might be hard to resist but some bargain bucket deals are allegedly taking tourists for a ride.
Angry British holidaymakers reeled in by prices as low as £7 accuse Croatian-based Carwiz of bullying sales tactics, fabricating damage, verbal abuse and even assault.
8
Simone Baron caught a Carwiz rep on camera as he appeared to manhandle her from the counter, before telling her sister Nicole: 'F*** off"
Credit: Darren Fletcher
8
Carwiz operates in 450 locations worldwide, with franchises across Europe, Asia and as far away as Miami
Credit: LinkedIn
Online reviews of the firm's franchises seen by The Sun allege staff have forged documents, up-sold unnecessary insurance, and taken unauthorised payments from credit cards.
Meanwhile 36-year-old Londoner Simone Baron caught a Carwiz rep on camera as he appeared to manhandle her from the counter, before telling her sister Nicole: 'F*** off.'
Simone, who works for a tech firm, told The Sun: 'I know there are reputable companies out there, but clearly I went for one that isn't.
'The stress I felt in that Carwiz office and for days afterwards was off the scale.
'I won't be renting a car from them or anyone else ever again.'
Carwiz operates in 450 locations worldwide, with franchises across Europe, Asia and as far away as Miami.
The firm's latest franchise opened last month at London Heathrow, and the company claims to offer a "premium service, affordability, and a little bit of magic".
But customers we spoke to branded Carwiz's franchises a racket.
Simone claimed she was stunned when Nicole found a £7.68 deal on travel site Booking.com with a hire firm operating a Carwiz franchise in Bucharest.
The sisters jetted to the Romanian capital for a four-day spa break in late May with Nicole's daughters, aged two and three.
Avoid being ripped off by car hire companies with these four top tips
Simone said: 'A guy wearing the purple Carwiz top picked us up at the airport and took us to their office nearby.
'For the next two hours he tried to sell me damage waiver insurance at a cost of €200 (£173). I didn't need it as I was already covered, but he wouldn't take no for an answer.
'We'd been up since 2am, the kids were tired and hungry, and I was on the verge of just walking away and getting a taxi when he finally gave in and let us take our car.
'But before we drove to our hotel, I spent 15 minutes taking videos of all the existing damage.
"I was obsessed with documenting every scratch and blemish I could find. I covered everything.'
'Joke'
8
Simone said the experience was 'unlike anything I've ever encountered in all my years travelling'
Credit: Darren Fletcher
8
Simone said the ordeal upset her two-year-old niece
Credit: Supplied
Simone explained they drove for just 15 minutes a day from their accommodation to a luxury thermal spa complex on the outskirts of Bucharest.
Their car was parked in the hotel's gated compound at night.
'I felt smug when we dropped it back because I knew I was returning it in the exact same condition,' Simone added.
'The guy started pointing out blemishes, but I had video proof for them all.
'Then he went straight to the front left bumper and said he'd found a scratch underneath the car.
'I burst out laughing because I honestly thought it was a joke, but then he said it was going to cost €400 (£350) to repair, and we'd have to sign some paperwork if we wanted our deposit back.
'He wouldn't give us the damage report to read, so I refused to sign and told him I wasn't responsible.
As far as I'm concerned, it was assault
Simone Baron
'When I reached over the counter to take my credit card back, he barged me out of the way and grabbed my arms.
'Nicole told him it was disgusting that he'd put his hands on me, but he just snapped back, 'F*** off'.
"I was so angry, it was unlike anything I've ever encountered in all my years travelling.
'Even the kids were upset. For days afterwards, my two-year-old niece kept asking, 'What happened to you, Aunty? What did the naughty man do?'
'As far as I'm concerned, it was assault."
Simone's deposit was returned in the following days, but on Friday June 6 the rental firm - trading as Premium Drax - took a payment of £359.71 from her Tesco credit card.
8
Simone's deposit was returned in the following days, but on Friday June 6 the rental firm - trading as Premium Drax - took a payment of £359.71 from her Tesco credit card
Credit: Supplied
The cash was eventually refunded after she complained to Tesco Bank.
'I didn't admit to the damage and certainly didn't authorise the payment,' she said.
'I did get my money back, but I'll never know if it was taken from the rental firm or covered by my bank.
'I can't stand to think of this company profiting. They'll just keep doing it.'
'Scamming operation'
Byron Hayes, 46, who works in finance, claimed he had a similar experience at a Carwiz franchise in Warsaw, Poland, after booking through Ryanair's website.
The office was unmanned when he dropped off the car - and he said he woke the next morning to a €626.87 (£541) repair bill sent by email.
'It was for a tiny dent on the bonnet,' said Byron, from Dublin.
'I know for certain it wasn't there when I returned the car.
'They sent me a photo of the damage, but it didn't include the registration of the car, so there was no way I could validate that it was even the vehicle I'd rented.
'After several back and forth emails they eventually sent me a picture of the car with the registration I had rented - but it had no damage on it.
'They said this was a picture taken before we'd rented the car and that they had already sent us pictures showing the damage.
'I told them I wasn't happy with what they were providing and again asked for the correct documents. Then they went quiet on me and unblocked the deposit they'd taken on my credit card.
I rent cars several times a year and I'm not the kind of person to duck out of responsibility. I have no problem with paying for damage I've caused, and have done so in the past. In this case I was completely blameless
Byron Hayes
'I assumed the matter was closed, but three weeks later on the final 30-business day time limit for a merchant to charge your card, at five minutes to midnight, I had an email saying my card had been charged €626.87, plus a €10 (£8.64) currency exchange fee."
Byron was able to recover the lost cash by claiming on insurance.
He is now collecting customers' experiences of Carwiz to submit a joint complaint to the European Consumer Commission.
He added: 'I rent cars several times a year and I'm not the kind of person to duck out of responsibility. I have no problem with paying for damage I've caused, and have done so in the past.
'In this case I was completely blameless. I thought perhaps it was just an issue with this one office and I'd been unlucky, but when I looked at the reviews for Carwiz it seemed to be happening all over Europe.
"'They should be investigated."
'We didn't even use the car'
8
Tim Hunt and his fiancée Rachel Sim claim they didn't even use their hire car on holiday because taxis were so cheap
Credit: Supplied
Council enforcement officer Tim Hunt, 51, and fiance Rachel Sim, 44, from Barry, South Wales, also picked up a rental from an office operating Carwiz's Bucharest franchise on April 14 this year.
They ended up leaving the white Mercedes in their hotel car park for the entirety of their four-day trip - but were still charged over £1,100 for marks on the paintwork Tim says were already there.
'Taxis were so cheap in Romania, we didn't even use the car!' Tim said.
When Rachel challenged the rep, he twice barked at her to "Get the the f*** out" of the office, which she recorded on camera.
Tim alleged Rachel was also kicked in the shin.
Taxis were so cheap in Romania, we didn't even use the car!
Tim Hunt
His card was charged £1,109 on April 22 after his return to the UK, and he was forced to claim on damage waiver insurance to recover the cash.
'It's almost like admitting you've done something wrong,' Tim said. 'And they're still getting the money. I was fuming!'
He left angry reviews of Carwiz on LinkedIn and was subsequently messaged by the company's CEO, Krešimir Dobrilović, who threatened to sue him.
Tim said: 'I told him to crack on. In the meantime, I've been in touch with Booking.com to request they stop using Carwiz.'
Tripadvisor reviews reveal other holidaymakers claiming to have almost identical experiences at Carwiz franchises in numerous locations, including Athens, Sicily, and Gdansk.
8
Tim was fuming when his card was charged £1,109 on April 22 after his return to the UK, and he was forced to claim on damage waiver insurance to recover the cash
Credit: Supplied
8
Tim left angry reviews of Carwiz on LinkedIn and was subsequently messaged by the company's CEO, Krešimir Dobrilović, who threatened to sue him
Credit: Supplied
It's the same story on Trustpilot, where Carwiz has racked up almost 200 1-star reviews. Tourists complain of being stung in Croatia, Katowice and Crete.
A recent survey by consumer advice experts Which revealed a shocking 42 per cent of car renters have been hit by bogus damage claims.
They said the issue is 'well known' in the industry and advised taking full damage waiver insurance, inspecting the car inside and out and taking photos.
Any damage report should also be photographed, they say.
They also suggest demanding evidence of the damage and how repairs are calculated before escalating your complaint.
The European Car Rental Conciliation Service can help resolve cross-border disputes.
However, only participating companies are bound by the scheme and they tend to be bigger players such as Avis, Enterprise and Hertz.
The Sun's Travel Editor shares her top tips for hiring a car abroad
IT'S easy for rip-off car hire merchants to try to ruin your holiday.
They can charge you a fortune to repair scratches and bumps, extortionate re-fuelling costs and ridiculous fees for insurance with their bullying tactics.
But there are four easy ways to avoid being duped and your dream getaway becoming a holiday from hell.
The Sun's Travel Editor Lisa Minot, reporting from Camp du Domaine, in Southern France, shares her top tips that will save you a fortune.
Reputable hire companies
If the price seems too good to be true, it is too good to be true.
When you look at these rip-off merchants that we're seeing increasingly, people have used them because the price was so cheap.
Look for reliable, established brands. Go for one of the big brands; it may cost you a little bit more, but in the long run it will work out much better.
Insurance rip-off
Next, look at exactly what you get included in the price.
I never take the excess car insurance from the car hire provider. I always book my own. I've got an annual policy. It's much cheaper.
You can buy excess car hire polices in the UK; they are effectively like travel insurance but they protect your car.
Should you have an accident, it protects the no claims bonus, and they are very good value.
They are accepted by every reputable car hire company; if they try to convince you that you can't use it and you have to buy theirs, that is wrong.
There are some very high pressure selling techniques around at the moment, trying to up-sell you various different things. You have to be strong.
You don't need to take a policy out, you've taken an excess care hire policy out in the UK.
You could also get yourself an annual, or even a two-week excess waiver policy from a specific company in the UK, too.
Document dents
The one thing you must do when they hand over the keys to the car is make sure that you take as much video and photographic evidence as possible before you leave.
Very often they will give you a form where you're meant to mark little crosses where you see dents, scratches and other problems.
But do take photos and videos yourself; it's much more important because it's timestamped and means you have incontrovertible evidence to counter any claims, should they come about.
It's really important, if you do see any damage on the car when you pick it up, to make sure you have alerted the hire company.
You could say to them: "Look, I've noted this damage. Here's my photo of it. I'm going to be returning it with the same damage on the car, because this was here before I hired the car.'
Fill up yourself
The fuelling policy that your car hire comes with is really important, too. Make sure you choose to refuel yourself and a 'full to full' option.
Don't leave it up to the car company to refuel your car at the end of your trip, because that means they are deciding what the price is.
It gives you the opportunity to find a cheaper petrol station. Make sure you fill the car up - if you're having to drive five or 10 miles to get back to the care hire company, that's acceptable.
We're seeing exactly the same with electric cars now. It's really important that you're in control of where you are recharging because the prices can vary drastically.
Book smart
Another top tip is make sure you book your hire car with a credit card, because it will give you much more protection than a debit card.
But also it means the company will take your deposit, which they hold, from your credit card rather than out your spending money.
A spokesperson for Carwiz told The Sun: "At CARWIZ, we categorically distance ourselves from any suggestion that unethical or
aggressive practices are in any way part of our business model.
"These are isolated incidents that in no way reflect the values, standards, or expectations that we support as a global brand.
"We sincerely regret that the potentially injured client did not contact us immediately after the unfortunate event, in order to immediately determine all the circumstances, because it is our goal to prevent all such and possible future unpleasant situations.
"Our franchise partner in Bucharest is operating another rental brand alongside CARWIZ from the same physical location. In several cases, vehicles and services appear to have been issued under a different brand identity, while still being processed within a CARWIZ-branded environment, including signage, uniforms, and physical premises.
We fully understand how, from the customer's point of view, this leads to the perception that the service is being provided directly by CARWIZ. When staff in CARWIZ uniforms hand over a vehicle from a CARWIZ-branded office, the distinction between brands is understandably blurred, even if the booking, payment, and contract technically fall under a separate company or brand entity.
"We are currently conducting a formal internal review and will take the necessary measures to eliminate all forms of dual-branding at CARWIZ locations in the future.
"At CARWIZ International, we continuously monitor, audit, and improve our global network to uphold the standards our brand represents. We are committed to ensuring that every customer feels respected, safe, and well-served."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Gunmen of the Troubles: The Nutting Squad – who were the IRA's security team really loyal to?
The Gunmen of the Troubles: The Nutting Squad – who were the IRA's security team really loyal to?

Belfast Telegraph

time23 minutes ago

  • Belfast Telegraph

The Gunmen of the Troubles: The Nutting Squad – who were the IRA's security team really loyal to?

Paddy 'PM' Monaghan has been reported as a British agent, making him the third senior member to be suspected of being a double agent. Its top tier also included the likes of Freddie Scappaticci and leader, John Joe Magee, who are both now believed to have been spies themselves. How did this group, who had access to some of the IRA's most guarded secrets become riddled with double agents? Presenter Kevin Doyle is joined by Allison Morris to look at the brutality of the 'Nutting Squad' and whether its senior ranks were loyal to the IRA or to the British. This podcast was first released in September 2023.

Pilot's terrifying final words on deadly flight to Tenerife from UK
Pilot's terrifying final words on deadly flight to Tenerife from UK

Daily Record

time25 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

Pilot's terrifying final words on deadly flight to Tenerife from UK

A British Airways flight from Heathrow was the second plane involved in the Tenerife airport disaster, but it never reached the island. Tenerife, with its sun-soaked beaches, is a favourite holiday destination for Brits. ‌ However, on 22 March 1977, a horrific tragedy unfolded when a passenger flight destined for Tenerife North airport, then known as Los Rodeos Airport, crashed, claiming the lives of all 583 people on board. ‌ It comes as, just three years after the first Tenerife plane crash, a Delta Flight exploded shortly after take-off, killing all passengers and crew on board. ‌ Tenerife boasts two airports, but Tenerife North is notoriously challenging for pilots due to its altitude of 2,000ft and often cloudy weather conditions that hamper visibility. Tragedy struck again just three years later, at 9.20am on 25 April 1980, when Dan-Air's Flight 1008 left Manchester Airport for Tenerife, carrying mainly British holidaymakers eager for the Canary Islands' sunny beaches and breathtaking landscapes. The flight crew comprised three seasoned pilots - Captain Arthur Whelan, 50, co-pilot First Officer Michael Firth, 33, and flight engineer Raymond Carey, 33. Five flight attendants were also on board, bringing the total number of passengers and crew to 146. For three hours, the flight went smoothly until the crew began their descent at 1pm local time, according to the Mirror. The winds were gusting from an unexpected direction, forcing air traffic to be redirected to Runway 12 rather than the standard landing strip. ‌ But this sparked a dilemma for air traffic controller Justo Camin, 34, as another aircraft was already approaching the identical runway, creating the terrifying prospect of a mid-air collision between the two planes. Operating without radar assistance, Camin was compelled to depend on procedural techniques to control air traffic and he directed each aircraft to stick to a pre-planned route. At 1:18 pm, Camin recognised he needed to place the Dan Air crew into a holding pattern to enable the aircraft in front to touch down safely on Runway 12. ‌ Yet, there was no established holding pattern for this runway, forcing Camin to think on his feet. He ordered Flight 1008 to enter a left-hand holding pattern, circling until the other flight had cleared. Responding to First Officer Firth's position report, Camin stated, "Roger, the er, standard holding pattern overhead Foxtrot Papa is inbound heading one five zero, turn to the left, call you back shortly." ‌ Captain Whelan responded with a brief "Roger", neglecting to repeat Camin's instructions back to him. Had he done so, the looming catastrophe might have been prevented. ‌ Nevertheless, when Camin told them to "turn to the left," he meant to say "turns to the left," specifying the direction the crew should follow whilst executing the holding pattern. But missing the vital 's', the crew understood this as "turn to the left." Camin, who had also authorised the flight to ascend to 5,000 feet, made a minor but crucial error. ‌ Captain Whelan, puzzled by the sudden directive to enter a holding pattern not indicated on any of his charts, executed a single left turn, aligning with a heading of 150 degrees, convinced this was what the controller intended. They were now soaring over mountainous terrain, where the minimum safe altitude was a staggering 14,500 feet. Just one minute and six seconds before the devastating crash, one of the pilots said, "bloody strange hold, isn't it?" adding, "it doesn't parallel with the runway or anything." ‌ The cockpit voice recording clearly captured the crew's escalating unease, yet no one challenged the controller's instructions. Controller Camin, under the assumption the plane was over the sea in his makeshift holding pattern, permitted the aircraft to descend another 1,000 feet, unaware it was actually amidst the mountains. Captain Whelan voiced his concerns about Camin's instruction to his co-pilot in the cockpit, saying, "I don't like that." ‌ His co-pilot replied, "they want us to keep going more round, don't they?" At this juncture, the automatic ground alarm blared in the cockpit, urging them to "pull up, pull up!" In a desperate attempt to avoid the looming mountainous terrain, Captain Whelan abruptly aborted his left turn for a drastic right turn. He believed this manoeuvre would enable them to circumvent the imminent obstacle. Typically, when hearing the alarm, the correct response would be to "pull up" in a bid to gain sufficient altitude to clear any surrounding terrain. ‌ Co-pilot Firth, after examining the chart, recognised the captain's decision was poorly judged and suggested different courses of action. The phrase "let's get out of here," uttered by Flight Engineer Carey, echoed through the cockpit voice recorder (CVR). Despite the engineer's warning, Captain Whelan continued with the steep right turn, which caused a drop of 300 feet. ‌ Spanish investigators declared categorically in their report this precise manoeuvre eliminated any possibility of avoiding catastrophe. Alerts from Flight Engineer Carey, "bank angle, bank angle!" ring out as the final recorded words before the CVR falls silent. Dan-Air Flight 1008 met its devastating fate as it slammed into La Esperanza at a height of 5,450 feet, just 92 feet (28 metres) below the summit. ‌ The impact destroyed most of the aircraft immediately, spreading wreckage across the mountainside. The tail portion of the plane careered several hundred metres, ultimately smashing to the ground, tumbling into a gorge, and breaking apart. Small fires broke out amidst the scattered debris, and Tenerife North Airport was shaken by the crash alarm for the second time in just over three years. Rescue teams arrived at the mountain within hours, but it was immediately apparent that none of the 146 passengers on board had survived the crash. ‌ The scene was so catastrophic not a single intact human body could be found, and many victims could not be definitively identified. While acknowledging the air traffic controller's error, Spanish investigators placed the entirety of the blame on the Dan Air crew. However, British investigators argued the controller should have recognised sooner the proximity between the two planes would pose a problem, allowing him to implement a standard holding pattern and prevent any confusion amongst the crew. They further contended the controller should not have issued an untested and non-standard holding pattern, but conceded that the Dan Air crew did not question the controller's instructions or seek clarification. ‌ The decision by Camin to allow flight 1008 to descend to 5,000 feet also drew criticism from the British team. They argued that if the holding pattern had been designed according to official regulations, the minimum altitude should have been set at 7,000 feet. Upon receiving a ground proximity warning, the captain - unable to see due to fog and cloud - opted to make a right turn, which tragically led them directly into the mountain. Typically, crews are expected to ascend as high as possible in response to such an alarm. What remains undisputed, however, is the omission of a single letter in a word triggered the series of events that ultimately resulted in the crash. ‌ Had the controller used "turns" instead of "turn", the tragic crash could have been averted. The investigation into the crash led to an increased emphasis on clear, standardised procedures across all flight operations, including holding patterns. The incident underscored the importance of unambiguous communication between air traffic controllers and pilots, with a particular focus on pilots repeating instructions from Air Traffic Control to eliminate any potential misunderstandings. Despite the tragedy, Dan Air managed to bounce back and continued operations until 1992 when it was acquired by British Airways. Even though it marked the largest loss of life on a British aircraft, the memory of Dan Air Flight 1008 and the 146 lives tragically lost that day seems to have faded over the last 45 years.

Firefly Aerospace eyes Japan rocket launches for Asia market
Firefly Aerospace eyes Japan rocket launches for Asia market

Reuters

time26 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Firefly Aerospace eyes Japan rocket launches for Asia market

TOKYO, Aug 18 (Reuters) - Firefly Aerospace (FLY.O), opens new tab is exploring an option to launch its Alpha rocket from Japan as the U.S. rocket maker expands its satellite launch services globally, a Japanese company operating a spaceport in the country's northern Hokkaido said on Monday. The plan could make Japan the second offshore launch site - and first in Asia - for Firefly, the Texas-based rival to Elon Musk's market leader SpaceX, which had its Nasdaq debut earlier this month and is preparing for an Alpha launch in Sweden. Space Cotan, operator of the Hokkaido Spaceport located about 820 km (510 mi) northeast of Tokyo, said it and Firefly signed a preliminary agreement to study the feasibility of launching the small-lift rocket Alpha from there. Launching Alpha from Japan "would allow us to serve the larger satellite industry in Asia and add resiliency for U.S. allies with a proven orbital launch vehicle," Adam Oakes, Firefly's vice president of launch, said in a statement published on Space Cotan's website. A feasibility study would be conducted to assess the regulatory hurdles, timeframe and investments for a launch pad for Alpha in Hokkaido, said Space Cotan spokesperson Ryota Ito. The plan would require a space technology safeguards agreement (TSA) between Washington and Tokyo that would allow American rocket launches in Japan, Ito added. The governments last year kicked off the negotiations but have not reached an agreement. A U.S.-Sweden TSA signed in June cleared the path for Firefly's launches from the Arctic. Four of Firefly's six Alpha flights since 2021 have ended in failure, most recently in April. While Japan's national space agency has launched rockets for decades, private rockets are nascent and most Japanese satellite operators rely on foreign options such as SpaceX's Falcon 9 or Rocket Lab's (RKLB.O), opens new tab Electron. Previously, U.S. company Virgin Orbit aimed to use Japan's southwest Oita Airport for launches but the plan was scrapped after the firm went bankrupt in 2023. Colorado-based Sierra Space has an ongoing plan to land its spaceplane on Oita beyond 2027. Taiwanese firm TiSpace last month conducted what could be the first foreign launch in Hokkaido, but the suborbital flight failed within a minute. Japan's government is targeting 30 launches of Japanese rockets a year by the early 2030s and subsidises domestic enterprises such as Space One and Toyota-backed Interstellar Technologies.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store