The rise of the Digital Vegan: Why celebrity endorsements are losing their shine
In today's culture of constant scrolling and content overload, trust has emerged as the rarest and most valuable commodity. For Gen Z, a generation raised on algorithmic content, viral trends, and curated perfection, authenticity is more than a buzzword. It's non-negotiable. And nowhere is this shift more visible than in how brands choose to communicate.
Celebrity endorsements
, once a guaranteed ticket to visibility and credibility, are rapidly losing relevance. The sparkle is fading. Not because fame has lost its power, but because fame without authenticity feels hollow. In its place, a new mindset is taking root: the
Digital Vegan
. Not a demographic, but a digital philosophy. One that prioritises unfiltered connection, purpose-led engagement, and discovery that feels earned, not engineered.
Who Are Digital Vegans?
Digital Vegans are the users who scroll past the ads, skip the sponsored posts, and seek out brands through word-of-mouth, subcultures, and
long-form storytelling
. They're the ones watching explainer videos at 2 AM, reading Reddit threads, and trusting micro-creators over macro-influencers. They don't want the polished pitch - they want the process, the product, and the person behind it.
For them, the litmus test is simple: does the person promoting this product actually live it? If the answer is no, the interest dies fast.
Authenticity is the New Influence
Take the world of fantasy sports and skill-based gaming. It's filled with creators who don't just promote games -they live them. They share strategies, data breakdowns, and personal experiences not for brand deals, but out of genuine passion. This kind of content doesn't sell, it teaches. And in doing so, it builds a much deeper level of trust. Compare that to a celebrity appearing in a flashy ad for a fantasy gaming app they've likely never used, it doesn't land the same.
That's why the future is user-led. Brands aren't discovered through ads -they're discovered through people. And those people are building trust, one honest interaction at a time. As some are already calling out, trust is fast becoming the currency of the digital world.
Rewriting the Rules of Endorsement
Sure, iconic partnerships like Michael Jordan and Nike changed the game. But they worked because they weren't surface-level. They evolved together. Contrast that with the rise of campaigns like Terence Reilly's, who made Crocs cool again, not with an endorsement deal, but by owning the culture around them. Or Red Bull, which chose to build an entire world of adventure and extreme sports, where the product became a symbol of something bigger.
The Quiet Brands Will Win
The future of brand building won't be led by volume. It'll be led by meaning. Loud campaigns are being replaced by immersive ecosystems. What matters most now is the ability to create belonging, to show up where your audience already lives, and to do it with honesty.
So don't chase the biggest name. Chase resonance. Don't just be seen. Be believed. Because in the age of Digital Vegans, the most powerful brands are the ones that whisper and still get heard.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
4 hours ago
- NDTV
77% Of Gen Z Bring Parents To Job Interviews, Even For Salary Talks And Hiring Tests
A recent survey by Resume Templates reveals that 77% of Gen Z job seekers have involved their parents in the hiring process, with many bringing them along to interviews, salary negotiations, and even test assessments, reported the Fortune Magazine. Among those whose parents attended interviews, 40% reported they sat in during the discussion, while one-third said their parents asked or answered questions. Around 27% noted that parents negotiated compensation or benefits, and some even introduced themselves directly to hiring managers, according to the study by Resume Templates. Beyond interviews, parental involvement extends to nearly all stages of the job search. Over 75% of Gen Z candidates used a parent as a reference, 63% had them apply for jobs on their behalf, and more than half allowed their parents to email or call hiring managers. Notably, 48% had parents complete test assignments, and 41% let them handle initial HR interactions, according to Fortune. Experts attribute this trend to Gen Z's lack of professional experience and limited networks, worsened by the pandemic's impact on social development. The tight entry-level job market has also added pressure, pushing young applicants to seek support from trusted sources-primarily their parents. While some view this involvement as overstepping, others see it as a reflection of the changing dynamics in today's workforce. Experts suggest using AI tools like ChatGPT to better prepare for job applications and interviews. What Gen Z asked their parents to do while job hunting? An overwhelming 90% of Gen Z job seekers asked their parents to help find jobs to apply to, while 75% listed them as references. Around 70% had parents submit applications on their behalf, and 60% sought their help in emailing or speaking with hiring managers directly. Over half asked parents to complete test assignments (55%) and handle HR screener calls (45%). Additionally, 35% relied on their parents to write resumes, and 30% for cover letters.
Mint
9 hours ago
- Mint
AI threatens entry-level lobs? Tech openings for new grads have already been halved, says report
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is significantly impacting the job market for new graduates , with the tech sector taking the worst hit. According to a recent report by VC firm SignalFire, job openings for new graduates at the 15 tech largest companies have been cut by over 50 per cent since 2019. The report also stated that before the pandemic, new graduates made up 15 per cent of Big Tech hires, now, that number has dropped to just 7 per cent. This shift can be attributed to companies using AI to automate junior-level tasks and giving them an incentive to delay or reduce early-career hiring. However, experts warn that while this may cut costs in the short term, it could weaken the leadership pipeline in the years ahead, Fortune reported. Kenneth Kang, a computer science graduate, spent his first year after college applying for more than 2,500 jobs, out of which he only got 10 interviews. 'It was very devastating,' he told Fortune. 'Honestly, I thought that having a 3.98 GPA, getting recognition letters, and having an interesting experience in the past, perhaps I could get a full-time job offer easily. But that was not true.' Kang eventually got an offer from Adidas, where he had interned the previous summer, after more than 10 months of endless job applications. This instance shows that the traditional corporate career path, which once began from entry-level roles with on-the-job training is becoming less common. Companies are increasingly expecting new hires to arrive with skills and experience that were once taught on the job. AI is fueling this trend by efficiently handling tasks typically performed by junior employees such as data cleaning, summarization, and basic quality assurance. Shrinking opportunities: Data from Handshake, a Gen Z-focused career platform, shows that entry-level job postings for traditional corporate roles dropped by about 15 per cent last year. Struggling interns: The number of internships converting to full-time offers is also at a five-year low. In 2023–24, only 62 per cent of interns received full-time offers, according to the National Association of Colleges and Employers. Hybrid interns converted at even lower rates than those who were in person. While companies may benefit from short-term cost savings by reducing entry-level hiring, experts warn that this could lead to a significant skills gap in the future as after some point, the companies run out of experts. 'If a lot of firms are cutting, cutting, cutting at the entry level, there's a fear that they might actually miss out on the talent that's going to create their pipeline going forward, that's going to become the managers, executives, etc.,' Tristan L. Botelho, associate professor of organizational behavior at Yale School of Management, told Fortune. Stella Pachidi, a senior lecturer in technology and work at King's Business School mirrored Botelho's thoughts by stating, 'Everyone is just focused on the current efficiencies and not necessarily thinking further about the future.' The rise of AI is also influencing academia, as both professors and students have realized that the majority of work performed in some university courses can be assisted, if not nearly totally automated, by AI. Students were some of the first to realize that ChatGPT is capable of writing essays and summarizing long texts. But while AI tools may help students to lighten their academic load, professors told Fortune they were worried about the prospect of a generation lacking critical skills and traditional education. Forture said citing a study from MIT that LLM (large language model) use can reduce neural engagement and harm learning among students, especially younger users. The study also found that ChatGPT users had the lowest brain engagement and 'consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic, and behavioral levels.'
Mint
9 hours ago
- Mint
Candidate lacks ‘oomph': Leaked video of interviewers' private chat reveals ‘honest feeedback'
A woman interviewed on Zoom thought she had done fairly well. But, later, she discovered something shocking. The interview">interview was recorded on the Fathom app, and she accidentally received not only the recap but also a video of the interviewers' private chat. After she logged off, the executive director said he liked her and found her 'chill'. But, the newly-hired director strongly criticised her and called her the weakest among the three other candidates. It "felt like pulling teeth", she said. The executive director seemed to agree and said she was underwhelming, perhaps only good on paper. 'Her energy was muted,' he said. 'She might be a function of what looks good on paper... and lacking some energy." "Energy, drive, curiosity, you know... she could perform on the job but I was looking for a little more 'oomph'," the new director added. The new director then told the executive director that they should interview her in person to see if they could 'get a vibe' for her. After discussing her, the two interviewers casually talked about another candidate, a team dinner and even a board member's dogsitting problem. The Reddit user was disturbed by how dismissive the new director seemed, and how the executive director agreed with her on everything. Then, the story took a twist. On the same day, she was offered her real dream job with a respected organisation she had wanted for months. Feeling relieved and amused, she decided not to attend the second round with the first company. 'I will not be going to the in-person interview at that sh*tty office, but I think we should have a little fun with this, no? Also, who's free on the 20th to rock up for the team dinner?' she joked. Other Reddit users reacted to her post. One of them thought the accidental feedback could be good. 'This is actually great for you. Interviewing is tough and getting honest feedback on interviews is even tougher. This will help you improve moving forward,' the user wrote. 'I used to walk into interviews trying to 'act' the way I thought the company wanted me to. Over time, I realised it's far better to show up as myself. If they don't like me for who I am, then it's simply not the right fit,' wrote another. 'Two worst hires I had both were enthusiastic during the interview. One enthusiastically deleted production data,' came a sarcastic comment.
