
'No Coalition In Tamil Nadu': Palaniswami's 'AIADMK Single Largest Party' Snub To BJP
Palaniswami's not-so-subtle snub to the BJP has left many confused as he has not been consistent on how the NDA is functioning with over eight months left to go for the polls
In an indirect warning to the BJP about who will be boss if the NDA wins the Tamil Nadu assembly election, AIADMK chief Edappadi K Palaniswami on Wednesday ruled out a coalition government in the state and said his party will be the single largest.
Palaniswami's not-so-subtle snub to the BJP has left many confused as he has not been consistent with his statements on how the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) is functioning with over eight months left to go for the elections.
At times, he has said the NDA in Tamil Nadu is stable and those attempting to create divisions among its constituents will not succeed. But on other occasions, he has stressed that his decisions will be final regarding the alliance.
'There will be no coalition government in Tamil Nadu. The AIADMK will become the single largest party," Palaniswami told News18. 'We will keep our doors open for the TVK (actor Vijay-led Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam). Whoever wants to defeat the DMK should join hands with the AIADMK."
'IT'S MY DECISION, RIGHT?'
'He says our alliance will form the government. I have already made it clear – who is heading this alliance? So it's my decision, right? Who becomes CM, who forms the government – both of us (Shah and I) have made it clear," he told reporters.
He said it has been made clear that the AIADMK will lead the NDA, form the government, and that he will be the CM should the alliance emerge victorious.
'No attempts to create a rift in the alliance will succeed. This is a stable alliance," he added.
The opposition leader claimed that the DMK did not expect the AIADMK to forge an alliance and, therefore, was criticising the grouping 'out of fear".
(With PTI inputs)
view comments
First Published:
July 16, 2025, 18:51 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Political slugfest erupts between Congress and BJP over Par Tapi Narmada River-Link project
The controversy over the Par Tapi Narmada River-Link project has resurfaced in South Gujarat's tribal-dominated districts even as a fresh political tussle has broken out between the BJP and the Congress. Meanwhile, the Par Tapi Narmada Link Project Hatao Sangharsh Samithi has decided to hold a public rally and meeting in Valsad on August 14, with similar meetings to follow in Tapi and Dangs districts. On Sunday, Gujarat BJP president and Union Minister CR Paatil while participating in a public event in Navsari had clarified that the project has been shelved for now. Replying to a question regarding the project status, Paatil said, 'The Par Tapi Narmada River-Link project has been postponed'. Targeting the Opposition, the Union minister said: 'The Congress leaders had no other issues, so they took up this (project) and misguided innocent tribal people. I wanted to assure the tribal communities that the government will never carry out any project which is against them… it is the instruction of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.' Recently, the project was also discussed in the Parliament during which it was claimed that the Detailed Project Report (DPR) of the project has been completed. Replying to a question, related to the project, in the Rajya Sabha, Minister of State (MoS) for Jal Shakti Raj Bhushan Chaudhary informed that the Central Government has formulated the National Perspective Plan (NPP) for the Inter-Linking of Rivers (ILR) programme to facilitate the transfer of water from surplus to deficit basins and regions. The National Water Development Agency (NWDA) will be responsible for implementing the ILR projects under the NPP framework. A total of 30 ILR projects have been identified, encompassing two major components: the Himalayan Component with 14 link projects and the Peninsular Component with 16 link projects, said the minister. As of July 2025, the Pre-Feasibility Reports (PFRs) have been completed for all 30 projects, Feasibility Reports (FRs) for 26 projects, and Detailed Project Reports (DPRs) for 11 projects. The Ken-Betwa Link Project (KBLP) is the first interlinking initiative, under the NPP, to have entered the implementation stage. For other link projects, under the NPP, considerations such as budgetary provisions, fund allocations, and expenditure will be taken up once these projects advance to the implementation phase, said sources. Earlier on July 29, Leader of Opposition in the Gujarat Assembly, Dr Tushar Chaudhary, had written to Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel and asked to clarify the project status. In the letter, Dr Chaudhary mentioned that 'in 2022, there was a widespread protest among the tribals in Valsad, Tapi and Dangs districts in South Gujarat over the project, following which, the state government had assured the tribals that the Central government project will not take place, as the state government's consent is necessary, and they won't give consent'. 'The tribals of South Gujarat are tense, and as the Chief Minister, you have to offer a clarification,' stated the letter. Meanwhile, CR Paatil during the Sunday's function also slammed Congress leader Dr Tushar Chaudhary over the letter. 'Dr Chaudhary has previously held the post of the MoS in the Central government… he should know that no such DPR was presented in the Parliament,' said Paatil. Replying to Paatil, the Congress MLA of Vansda in Navsari district, Anant Patel, in a video on social media, said, 'If you (BJP and Paatil) want to regain the trust of the tribal community, 'you' give it in writing that the project has been cancelled and will not take place.' Meanwhile, Valsad BJP MP Dhaval Patel during a press conference on Sunday said, 'The Par Tapi Narmada river-linking project will not take place in South Gujarat. I am assuring you as a son of a tribal. The Congress leaders are unnecessarily misguiding the innocent tribals.' Sharing the details about the August 14 meeting, MLA Anant Patel told the Indian Express, 'A large number of tribals from different districts and talukas will gather at Dharampur town in Valsad on August 14 to protest against the project'. He added, 'This event will be non-political. We will address the tribals in the town during a rally and hand a memorandum to the Mamlatdar.' He further added, 'We are also going to carry out similar public meetings and rallies in Tapi and Dangs districts in the coming days to make the tribals aware about the project.' Patel said, 'If Union Minister Paatil claims that the project won't take place, then he should release a white paper on this issue in the Parliament.' The project was envisioned under the 1980 National Perspective Plan under the former Union Ministry of Irrigation and the Central Water Commission (CWC). The project proposes to transfer river water from the surplus regions of the Western Ghats to the deficit regions of Saurashtra and Kutch. It proposes to link three rivers — Par, originating from Nashik in Maharashtra and flowing through Valsad, Tapi from Saputara that flows through Maharashtra and Surat in Gujarat, and Narmada originating in Madhya Pradesh and flowing through Maharashtra and Bharuch and Narmada districts in Gujarat. The link mainly includes the construction of seven dams (Jheri, Mohankavchali, Paikhed, Chasmandva, Chikkar, Dabdar and Kelwan), three diversion weirs (Paikhed, Chasmandva, and Chikkar dams), two tunnels (5.0 kilometers and 0.5 kilometers length), the 395-kilometre long canal (205 kilometre in Par-Tapi portion including the length of feeder canals and 190 km in Tapi-Narmada portion), and six powerhouses. Of these, the Jheri dam falls in Nashik, while the remaining dams are in Valsad and Dang districts of South Gujarat.


The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
LDF, BJP on confrontational path over TDB decision to hold global Ayyappa devotees' meet at Sabarimala
The Travancore Devaswom Board's (TDB) decision to hold an international conference of Ayyappa devotees at Sabarimala in September appears to have put the Left Democratic Front (LDF) government and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-backed by Hindu right-wing organisations, including the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), on a confrontational path ahead of the local body polls in Kerala later this year. Devaswom Minister V.N. Vasavan had last week projected the conference as a proactive measure to put Sabarimala on the global pilgrimage map. BJP former State president Kummanam Rajasekharan termed the proposed conference a cover for the LDF government to undermine Sabarimala's ancient traditions and practices. The VHP has criticised the proposed devotees' conference as a guise for the LDF to allow non-believers and political activists to use the revered temple as a bully pulpit for their disruptive propaganda. Cong. silent so far The Congress is yet to reveal its stance on the proposal. Nevertheless, it seemed not lost on opposing fronts in Kerala that the previous LDF government's socially sensitive decision to implement the 2019 Supreme Court decision to allow women of all ages into Sabarimala had triggered widespread protests backed by the Congress, the BJP, specific Hindu social organisations and a constellation of majoritarian right-wing outfits, rocking the government. The State police's attempt to escort women, including those of childbearing age, a shibboleth challenged by the Apex Court, had resulted in violence, police cases and injuries on both sides. 2019 protests The BJP said the LDF, 'which persecuted Ayyappa devotees in 2019 for upholding their faith,' had no moral right to hold an international conference of devotees. It alleged that the LDF had retracted from its promise to withdraw cases against Hindu women who held peaceful prayer meetings to protest against the government's bid to open Sabarimala to women of childbearing age. Mr. Rajasekharan alleged that a cash-strapped LDF government was exploiting lakhs of Ayyappa devotees, who make the spiritual trek, for easy profit. He said the LDF government charged the Ayyappa devotees extortionately for providing below-par camping facilities.


The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Honour killings a national problem requiring a separate law: Thirumavalavan
Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK) leader Thol. Thirumavalavan on Monday said 'honour killings' was not just a State- level problem but a national one. Such killings were committed not only in Tamil Nadu but also in other States including in Uttar Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan, Maharastra, Jharkhand and Madhya Pradesh. Such killings should not be treated as an ordinary crime but one that required special attention by enacting a separate law at the national level by the ruling BJP-led government at the Centre, Mr. Thirumavalavan said leading a protest demonstration organised by the VCK at Perambalur. The demonstration was held to urge the State government and the Centre to enact a law to prevent honour killings. The VCK had been continuously emphasising the need for a special law to prevent honour killings for several years, he said citing several such crimes reported in various parts of Tamil Nadu. The VCK alone had been condemning such heinous crimes in Tamil Nadu by mobilising the people. 'The bigger parties and the newer ones in Tamil Nadu do not speak in cases of murder of Dalits. Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam leader and cine actor Vijay could not even condemn such killings. AIADMK leader and former Chief Edappadi K. Palaniswami who had been criticising the DMK government did not even meet the family members of the murdered Dalit victim Kavin in Tirunelveli,' he alleged. He claimed the VCK alone had the guts to fight against social injustice. He wondered as to why the AIADMK could not hold a state-wide demonstration on the issue of caste killings. 'Parties want the votes of Dalits but would not speak in support of them', he said. The Left parties had been protesting the cruelty and violence against the Dalits. Similar demonstrations were organised in Tiruchi City and Mayiladuthurai as well.