Puma's new boss takes helm trailing Adidas and a recovering Nike
Hoeld, a decades-long veteran of cross-town rival Adidas AG, has the task of turning Puma around and charting a return to profit and growth. It's not the first time the 77-year-old brand has needed a makeover, and former bosses like Jochen Zeitz, now head of Harley-Davidson, and Bjorn Gulden, who became CEO of Adidas in 2023, both found ways to revitalize Puma's leaping cat.
But Hoeld has significant hurdles to clear. Fast-growing brands like On Holding AG, New Balance and Hoka are winning customers and taking more shelf space at retailers. Adidas is still riding high on its retro Sambas, while industry leader Nike is bouncing back under company veteran Elliott Hill with products like the Vomero 18 running shoe, after a rare rough patch for the Swoosh.Then there are challenges Puma can do little to control: a fast-appreciating euro and US President Donald Trump's trade tariffs ramping up industry costs. Hoeld took the first step toward what looks like a textbook reset on July 24, delivering a brutal financial reappraisal that sees a 20% plunge in sales in the coming months and Puma losing money this year."That tells you that something is really quite wrong," said Piral Dadhania, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets. "This is a fairly high-risk sort of turnaround. The execution becomes much more relevant in that situation."
Hoeld first has to stop the bleeding. He is inheriting a growing pile of unsold sneakers and apparel in warehouses around the world that could take Puma more than a year to work through and to convince retailers to buy from the brand again, Deutsche Bank analyst Adam Cochrane said in a note."It's pretty toxic," said Ingo Speich, a portfolio manager with Deka Investment in Frankfurt, a major Puma shareholder. "If you produce more and more shoes and widen your product range - at the same time as you get less retail space because other brands are far stronger - then it gets difficult."After Puma's profit warning, Hoeld linked the inventory challenge to big-picture questions that could take months to answer and even longer to execute on. "Do we have the right products for our consumers and our wholesale partners?" he asked. "If so, why is our brand not achieving the required visibility and engagement?" He promised to unveil his strategy in late October.
The slump is badly timed. The sneaker world has transformed in the past decade as Adidas and Nike pulled back from many retail partners, prioritizing direct-to-consumer sales channels in hopes of boosting profits. That approach backfired, with consumers embracing smaller brands like On, Hoka and New Balance that secured their products more space on retailers' shelves. Puma, though, failed to capitalize on Nike's stumbles, while Adidas quickly reversed course under Gulden, winning back retailers who couldn't get enough of the three-striped Sambas and similar models. Since Hill returned to Nike last fall, he's been repairing relationships with retail partners including Amazon.com, and the company appears set for a new era of growth.
Underdog For decades, Puma has occupied a tricky spot in the sporting goods world. Though it competes in everything from football and basketball to running, it's much smaller than its main rivals Adidas and Nike in that multi-sport game. Its products typically command lower prices, though it's had success when it carves out a niche, often as the underdog brand.When Gulden arrived at Puma in 2013, he refocused the company on performance sports and leaned heavily on the brand's one genuine superstar: sprinter Usain Bolt.Fast-forward just over a decade and there was little of that rebellious spirit in Puma's "Go Wild" ad this spring, which was aimed at everyday runners looking for feel-good vibes. The campaign struggled to stand out against Adidas's no-stress "You Got This" push, or On's video featuring Sesame Street's Elmo.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
What is Amadea? US auctioning seized $325M Russian superyacht equipped with 8 state rooms, helipad, gym and more
The United States is auctioning off the $325 million luxury superyacht Amadea, its first sale of a seized Russian superyacht since the launch of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Amadea: The 348-foot-long (106-meter-long) yacht, seized three years ago and currently docked in San Diego, was custom built by the German company Lürssen in 2017. (AP) The auction, which closes Sept. 10, comes as President Donald Trump seeks to increase pressure on Russian President Vladimir Putin to end the war. The U.S. has said it's working with allies to put pressure on Russian oligarchs, some of whom are close to Putin and have had their superyachts seized, to try to compel him to stop the war. The 348-foot-long (106-meter-long) yacht, seized three years ago and currently docked in San Diego, was custom built by the German company Lürssen in 2017. Designed by François Zuretti, the yacht features an interior with extensive marble work, eight state rooms, a beauty salon, a spa, a gym, a helipad, a swimming pool and an elevator. It accommodates 16 guests and 36 crew members. Determining the real ownership of the Amadea has been an issue of contention because of an opaque trail of trusts and shell companies. The superyacht is registered in the Cayman Islands and is owned by Millemarin Investments Ltd., also based in the Cayman Islands. The U.S. contends that Suleiman Kerimov, an economist and former Russian politician, who was sanctioned by the U.S. in 2018 for alleged money laundering, owns the yacht. Meanwhile, Eduard Khudainatov, a former chairman and chief executive of the state-controlled Russian oil and gas company Rosneft, who has not been sanctioned, claims to own it. U.S. prosecutors say Khudainatov is a straw owner of the yacht, intended to conceal the yacht's true owner, Kerimov. Litigation over the true ownership of the yacht is ongoing. A representative of Khudainatov said in an emailed statement Wednesday that the planned sale of the yacht is 'improper and premature' since Khudainatov is appealing a forfeiture ruling. 'We doubt it will attract any rational buyer at fair market price, because ownership can, and will, be challenged in courts outside the United States, exposing purchasers to years of costly, uncertain litigation,' said the representative, Adam Ford. The yacht has been virtually untouched since the National Maritime Services took custody of it in 2022. To submit a sealed bid on it, bidders must put in a 10 million euro deposit, the equivalent of roughly $11.6 million, to be considered. Ford said Khudainatov would go after any proceeds from the sale of the yacht, estimated to be worth $325 million. 'Should the government press ahead simply to staunch the mounting costs it is imposing on the American taxpayer, we will pursue the sale proceeds, and any shortfall from fair market value, once we prevail in court," Ford said. A U.S. aid package for Ukraine signed into law in May 2024 gave the U.S. the ability to seize Russian state assets located in the U.S. and use them for the benefit of Kyiv, which was attacked by Russia in February 2022.
Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
Swiss Firms Rethink Global Strategy After Tariff Surge
Simon Michel couldn't take the risk of waiting any longer. As Switzerland was assessing the shock announcement that the US would impose a 39% tariff, the chief executive officer of Ypsomed Holding AG realized that he needed to act. Ypsomed plans to move some production of medical devices to the German city of Schwerin, where the tariff is less than half the Swiss level. The executive also wants to ramp up production in the US, he told Bloomberg News. The Burgdorf-based company isn't alone. Across the country, executives and owners at businesses — from large multinationals such as food giant Nestle SA to small domestic champions — are trying to figure out how to deal with the new reality. The scale of the levy exceeded all expectations and caught the Swiss business elite off guard. In a call with executives on Monday, one of Switzerland's chief negotiators said that they were still working on getting the overall tariff rate down. Their response to her was blunt: there's no substitute for the US market. Plans to move, such as Michel's, could still change if Switzerland gets Donald Trump to lower the tariff. But with so much at stake, some businesses are taking matters into their own hands. Machine-tool maker Netstal Maschinen AG is looking to reduce the share of Swiss components in its supply chain for products aimed at the US market, which accounts for approximately 15% of revenue. Orders from the US have already fallen 20% in the first half of 2025, CEO Renzo Davatz said. And it's likely to get worse if the Swiss don't get a better deal. A one-hour drive away in Weggis, Adrian Steiner, the CEO of Thermoplan AG, which builds coffee machines for Starbucks among other things, is sketching out plans to expand production capacities in the EU and the US, he said. However, he wants to wait for a final decision until the US tariffs kick in. One high-profile consumer product caught up in the Swiss tariffs is Nespresso. Though Nestle SA sells the coffee capsules all over the world, it only produces them in Switzerland. Most of its other product lines are made locally for their respective markets. The same holds true for many of Switzerland's international listed companies, including consumer brands such as Lindt & Spruengli AG and Logitech International AG, as well as industrial players like ABB Ltd and Holcim AG. After Trump's so-called Liberation Day announcements on tariffs, some firms without fully diversified production front-loaded shippings to the US. Shipping company Kuehne and Nagel International AG saw a slight increase in industry-wide shipments from Switzerland to US in the period. Switzerland is only a small part of their business. But for companies that waited, believing the government's optimistic messaging about a US deal, there was a shock last week. Now, there's no time. 'There is some movement to expedite loadings, but generally the timeline is too tight to load unplanned shipments into containers and to then gate in and get on a ship,' a spokesperson for Kuehne and Nagel said. 'Many hinterland manufacturers simply did not have time.' The risks to the Swiss economy are sizable. A 39% tariff rate might knock off 1% of Switzerland's gross domestic product over the medium term. While large multinational companies have some chance of reorienting supply chains and production to cope, it's much harder for smaller family-owned businesses. There's also the personal cost. Lobby group Swissmem says the tariffs put tens of thousands of Swiss jobs at risk. Among Switzerland's top companies, Roche Holding AG and Novartis AG are in the clear for now as pharmaceuticals are exempt. But that might soon change, with Trump warning he could announce tariffs on the sector in the next week. Some companies have tried to get ahead of the tariffs by frontloading early in the year. 'We transferred a lot of stock already in the first six months of this year when the story about the tariffs started,' watchmaker Swatch said in a statement. 'In such a situation, inventory is key and a competitive advantage.' With assistance from Naomi Kresge, Jennifer Creery, Noele Illien and Sonja Wind.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
7 hours ago
- Business Standard
Running for top spot, Japan's ASICS eyes Nike and Adidas' turf in India
It has carved out a product and pricing strategy for every city based on its market potential Listen to This Article It has charted an ambitious target. Japanese premium sports goods giant ASICS — which sells 75 per cent of its shoes in the country at over ₹12,000 a pair — wants to be the No. 1 running shoe player in the $90-a-pair organised market in India, currently dominated by Nike, Adidas and Puma. To do so, it is making an aggressive push into Tier-II and Tier-III cities, where customers are ready to lap them up — as well as setting up company-owned stores in four to five locations across key metros.
