MP Chowta pushes to boost recruitment to armed forces from Dakshina Kannada
Mangaluru: Against the backdrop of escalating tension between India and Pakistan, Dakshina Kannada MP
Capt Brijesh Chowta
is taking steps to boost recruitment into the armed forces from the region.
In this direction, he recently met with Maj Gen Hari B Pillai, ADG (recruiting - states), HQ Recruiting Zone, Bengaluru, to discuss enhancing military recruitment and exploring the potential of establishing a military station in Dakshina Kannada.On the sidelines of this meeting, Capt Chowta told TOI: "I am working towards making Mangaluru more visible on the defence map.
As a first step, I want to provide the Army Recruitment Office with a permanent, accessible space within the city. They are currently operating out of a rented facility in Kulur, which limits visibility and reach."Further, he said that efforts are also underway to bring a T-55 medium tank to Mangaluru. "The tank, which played a significant role in the 1971 Indo-Pak war and was a mainstay of the Indian Army since its induction in 1966, was sanctioned and will soon be placed at a prominent location in the city," he said.Capt Chowta also said that the proposal for India's first Coast Guard Academy in Mangaluru is in its final stage, awaiting cabinet approval. "Our long-term goal is to create a cultural shift where more youth from Dakshina Kannada consider a career in the armed forces. While Mangalureans are patriotic, the military is not always their first career choice, often due to a lack of awareness or the abundance of other career opportunities here," he said.He noted that while recruitment numbers may be lower than in north India, yet, Dakshina Kannada in the last decade consistently contributed to the defence forces and has a strong ex-servicemen community.Further, he said that he spoke to the defence minister and is in discussions with private players about setting up a Sainik School in the region on a PPP model. "I also plan to raise awareness about career opportunities in the armed forces by actively involving NCC alumni and current cadets in outreach efforts. A conscious and sustained effort is needed to build awareness and foster a culture of service," Capt Chowta added.
Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with
Mother's Day wishes
,
messages
, and
quotes
!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Gender-based polarisation is making democratic consensus harder to achieve
On June 3, South Korea elected Lee Jae-Myung as their new president, ending months of political instability following Yoon Seok Yeol's declaration of martial law and impeachment. Lee now faces the daunting task of healing a deeply divided nation. Divisions extend beyond ideological lines, increasingly shaped by gender-based polarisation. Young women predominantly support progressive parties like Lee's Democratic Party (DP), while young men seem to back conservative forces like the People Power Party (PPP) and New Reform Party (NRP). Gender polarisation in South Korea While older generations often lean towards conservatives, what stands out in South Korea is the rising conservatism among Gen Z men, who now form the base of conservative/right-wing support. Young women, on the other hand, form the core of the progressive support base. Exit polls reflected a stark gender divide among Korean young voters. Only 24 per cent of men in their 20s supported Lee (DP), while a combined 74.1 per cent backed conservatives. In contrast, 58.1 per cent of women in the same age group voted for Lee. A similar pattern was also noticed among voters in their 30s. Gender division was also evident during the impeachment protests. Young men in their 20s and 30s largely joined pro-Yoon rallies, while young women dominated anti-Yoon demonstrations. Why the divide? South Korea performs poorly on most gender equality metrics. In 2025, the gender pay gap remained the highest in the OECD at 31.2 per cent. Despite these disparities, many young South Korean men (especially in their 20s) are turning conservative. Academics attribute this shift to socio-economic anxieties, including unemployment, military service, perceived loss of male privileges, and feelings of marginalisation and reverse discrimination, as women gain ground in traditionally male-dominated fields like education and employment. Online platforms, particularly male-dominated communities like Ilbe, have also become echo chambers for anti-feminist narratives and resentment-driven identity politics. Moreover, nationwide feminist movements like 4B, MeToo, Escape the Corset, and the Hyewha station protests against spy-camera voyeurism (molka) gained traction. These, however, also deepened gender divides. 'Feminism' became a slur, with many young men perceiving it as a threat rather than a push for equality. Why do men vote for conservatives? Political analysts Robert E Kelly and Jaekwon Suh note that many South Korean voters support one party mainly out of opposition to the other, with partisan divides increasingly driven by emotion rather than clear policy-based ideological distinctions. Parties like DP and PPP have tapped into emotional divides, especially around gender. Many young men feel alienated by the DP and support the PPP, which they see as defending their interests, reflected in Yoon's 2022 pledge to abolish the Gender Equality Ministry and blaming feminism for the country's low birth rate. In 2025, the conservative vote was split. Lee, known for his anti-feminist stance, tried to rally disaffected young men using Yoon's anti-women and pro-men playbook. PPP's leader Kim Moon-soo, also alienated women by remarking that 'women would rather raise dogs than have children'. Global Political Division between young men and women South Korea is not the only country experiencing political polarisation along gender lines. In many democracies, young men are increasingly gravitating toward conservatism, though the underlying causes vary. In the 2024 US presidential election, as per the AP VoteCast survey, Kamala Harris maintained an advantage among women, winning 53 per cent of their votes compared to Trump's 46 per cent. In contrast, Trump gained ground among men (including Black and Latino men), securing 54 per cent of their support. After the overturning of Roe v Wade in 2022, reproductive rights became a central issue for women. However, Trump's rhetoric dismissed women's concerns and appealed to male grievances about gender equality. Trump and Harris also strategically targeted gendered audiences. For instance, Trump appeared on The Joe Rogan Experience podcast, popular among young men, while Harris joined the Call Her Daddy podcast, which appeals to women under 35. In Germany's 2025 election, about 35 per cent of women between the ages of 18 and 24 voted for the far-left Die Linke Party, while 27 per cent of young men voted for the far-right Alternative for Germany (AFD party). What lies ahead? Gender-based polarisation is making democratic consensus harder to achieve. Instead of supporting a party's vision, voters increasingly vote against perceived threats to their identity. This weakens democracies, making politics more personal, polarised, and confrontational. Across the globe, young men and women are growing further apart in their worldviews. This growing gender divide is particularly concerning, as it may even affect Gen Z's ability to form relationships and start families — an alarming trend for countries like South Korea that are already facing declining birthrates. The writer is a Research Assistant at the Council for Strategic and Defence Research (CSDR) and a PhD Scholar in Korean Studies at Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), New Delhi
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
South Korea has got a new president, but the challenges remain
Despite Lee Jae-myung's election as president of South Korea, the challenge of healing the national divide and kick-starting growth in Asia's fourth-largest economy remains read more South Korea's President Lee Jae-myung takes his oath during his inauguration ceremony at the National Assembly in Seoul on June 4. Reuters Lee Jae-myung of the liberal Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) is the new occupant of Cheong Wa Dae, the presidential palace in Seoul, also known as the Blue House. He won the snap presidential election on June 3. Lee succeeds Yoon Suk-yeol, the now-disgraced former president from the conservative People Power Party (PPP), whose short-lived declaration of martial law in December led to his impeachment and unanimous removal from office by the Constitutional Court. With Lee's election, the chaos, confusion, and confrontation that have defined the past six months in South Korea has supposedly ended. But has it really? I'll answer that shortly. Key Issues in the Election The presidential election wasn't due until 2027 and wouldn't have happened this early under normal circumstances. But that changed on the night of December 3, 2024, when former President Yoon shocked the nation by declaring martial law. The move triggered mass protests, and on December 14, parliament voted to impeach him. Under the South Korean Constitution, a snap election must be held within 60 days of the Constitutional Court upholding the impeachment and formally removing the president. Given this backdrop, Yoon's failed martial law bid became the defining issue of the election, pushing all others to the sidelines. Lee campaigned on promises to strengthen democracy and heal a divided nation. He also vowed to prosecute those involved in Yoon's martial law attempt and implement stricter limits on a president's ability to declare such powers. However, other pressing issues remain for Lee to address, without the typical two-month honeymoon period usually granted to South Korean presidents. These include a faltering economy, spiraling prices, the unpredictable trade policies of Donald Trump, worsening ties with North Korea, and the delicate balancing act between China—South Korea's biggest trading partner—and the US, its key strategic ally. A Foregone Conclusion Because the election was framed from the start by the failed martial law, the People Power Party was on the defensive. The result, therefore, felt like a foregone conclusion. Unsurprisingly, it unfolded along expected lines. Lee Jae-myung of the DPK was elected the 21st President of the Republic of Korea, defeating Kim Moon-soo of the ruling PPP. Here's what happened: According to the National Election Commission (NEC), 79.4 per cent of the country's 44.4 million eligible voters cast their ballots—the highest turnout since the 1997 presidential election. Lee Jae-myung secured 49.4 per cent of the vote. Kim Moon-soo of the PPP came second with 41.2 percent. Lee Jun-seok of the Reform Party, a PPP splinter group, received 8.3 percent. Kwon Young-guk of the hastily formed Democratic Labor Party trailed far behind with 1 percent. Strongest in Decades When Lee lost the 2022 presidential election to Yoon Suk-yeol by the narrowest margin in South Korea's democratic history (47.83 per cent to 48.56 per cent), many declared his political career over. But just a year later, in the 2024 legislative elections, he led his party to a resounding victory, securing 173 seats—a two-thirds majority. When Yoon declared martial law on December 3, Lee seized the moment. He stormed the National Assembly in a dramatic late-night session to pass a resolution opposing the declaration, forcing Yoon to reverse his decision within hours. Lee's popularity surged, and, as widely expected, the 61-year-old was swiftly inaugurated on Wednesday, June 3. In a rare occurrence, Lee and his party now control both the presidency and parliament. This dual control makes him one of the most powerful presidents in South Korea's democratic history. It could prove to be a double-edged sword—more on that later. For now, a unified government offers Lee an opportunity to govern assertively until the next legislative election in 2028. He won't need many conservative votes to advance his agenda, while the conservative party itself is mired in internal crisis. The Reality Bites Lee's victory might have seemed inevitable given the conservatives' disarray. The PPP was so divided it struggled to even nominate a candidate before settling on Kim, a former leftist turned far-right firebrand. Given these dynamics, the PPP should have suffered a crushing defeat. But it didn't. And that's the sobering reality. South Korea remains politically fractured, and the post-election crisis is as serious as it was before—if not more so. Fragile Victory Despite an 8-point margin, Lee's victory is more fragile than it first appears. Here's a closer look: If Reform Party candidate Lee Jun-seok (8.3 per cent of the vote) had not run, the gap between Lee and the PPP would have been much narrower. Excluding two southwestern provinces—DPK strongholds where Lee won over 80 per cent—his lead over the PPP was just 26,000 votes out of nearly 35 million cast. In Seoul, the nation's capital and economic hub, the combined conservative vote exceeded Lee's by 0.5 percent. Rise of the Far Right The right-wing, and especially the far-right, remains a potent force. In conservative heartlands, their support has only grown. The two conservative candidates—Kim (41.15 per cent) and Lee Jun-seok (8.34 per cent)—together garnered more votes than Lee Jae-myung (49.42 per cent). Exit polls show far-right appeal is especially strong among young men. Three-quarters of men in their twenties voted for the two far-right candidates, compared to just over 58 per cent of women in that age group who supported Lee. In the 30s age bracket, around 60 per cent of men voted conservative, while 57 per cent of women voted for Lee. 2017 vs 2025 This isn't South Korea's first post-impeachment snap election. In 2017, following the impeachment of conservative President Park Geun-hye, liberal Moon Jae-in won. History repeated in 2025. Another conservative president was impeached, and another liberal won. But 2017 didn't mark the end of conservatism in South Korea. The same could be true in 2025—if conservatives are willing to reform and rebuild. Decoding Lee Jae-myung If there's one word that defines Lee Jae-myung, it's 'survivor'. He's endured extreme poverty, two suicide attempts, a near-fatal assassination, numerous criminal charges, and the martial law crisis. Now comes his toughest test: leading a deeply divided nation through a host of internal and external challenges. Lee, largely unknown outside South Korea, rose from hardship. According to his memoirs, he was the fifth of seven children in a dirt-poor family. Forced to leave school at 14, he worked in factories, suffering a workplace injury that left his left arm impaired. In 1982, he gained university admission on a full merit scholarship and later passed the notoriously difficult bar exam to become a lawyer. His rags-to-riches story resonates in a country that went from war-torn poverty to economic powerhouse in one generation. Boon or Bane Lee has cultivated an image as a pragmatic reformer focused on economic inequality. His journey from child laborer to lawyer to political leader is inspiring to many. But he's also polarising. Though he maintains his innocence, he faces multiple criminal charges, including bribery and election violations. He's seen by critics as a radical populist with little respect for democratic norms or institutional checks. Whether he becomes a reformist statesman like Kim Dae-jung—or another strongman—depends on his choices in the months ahead. Challenges Ahead Despite the peaceful conduct of this snap election, South Korea faces a long list of pressing issues: Domestically: Deep political and societal polarisation A slipping economy, with a 0.3 per cent contraction in quarter 1 and possible recession in quarter 2 Skyrocketing consumer prices One of the world's lowest birthrates and a rapidly ageing population An urgent need for institutional reform, including a proposed shift to a four-year presidential term with re-election Externally: Navigating between China (biggest trading partner) and the US (strategic ally) Restarting dialogue with North Korea after three years of deteriorating ties Coping with US President Donald Trump's unpredictable trade policies Managing the North Korea–Russia military partnership Most urgent of all: healing the national divide and kick-starting growth in Asia's fourth-largest economy. And What If… As the celebration fades, Lee faces a sobering reality. He is still on trial in the Supreme Court for election law violations. The trial was postponed to avoid influencing the vote. A conviction could have disqualified him from running. Now that he's president, the law states he cannot be prosecuted for criminal offenses—except for treason or insurrection. But it's unclear what happens if he's found guilty. That uncertainty may hang over his presidency for months to come. The author is a multi-disciplinary thought leader with Action Bias and an India based impact consultant. He is a keen watcher of changing national and international scenarios. He works as President Advisory Services of Consulting Company BARSYL. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Indian-American Paul Kapur, Trump's pick for key South Asia role, vows to focus on US-India ‘partnership'
During his nomination hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Kapur stressed that he would pursue a security and strategic partnership with India read more Kapur has written several books and articles about South Asia's security environment and US policy in the region. Paul Kapur, US President Donald Trump's nominee for a key role in South Asia, has highlighted that India and the United States share mutual goals, including maintaining a free and open Indo-Pacific region free from Chinese dominance. He also stressed the need to boost trade, enhance technology sharing, and improve energy access between the two nations. Kapur has been nominated for the role of Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs, a top diplomatic position that caters for US interests vis-a-vis India and its neighbourhood — including Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD On June 10, during his nomination hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Kapur stressed that he would pursue a security and strategic partnership with India, keeping in mind the best interests of America. He said he would 'pursue security cooperation where it is beneficial to the US interest, seeking opportunities for bilateral collaboration in trade and investment". 'If confirmed, I will work to further advance US-India relations and put our partnership on course to realise its tremendous promise,' he added. 'We will promote long-standing security interests with India, Pakistan through the pursuit of peace and stability and fight against terrorism," Kapur said. More about Paul Kapur In February 2025, President Trump nominated Paul Kapur for Assistant Secretary of State for South Asian Affairs. If confirmed, Kapur would replace Donald Lu, whose term ended on January 17, 2025. Renowned for his research on South Asian security and nuclear policy, Kapur is a professor in the Department of National Security Affairs at the US Naval Postgraduate School. He has also significantly influenced US foreign policy on South and Central Asia. Kapur earned his BA from Amherst College and his PhD from the University of Chicago. According to some media reports, Kapur has authored several influential works on South Asian security, nuclear policy, and international relations. His books include Jihad as Grand Strategy: Islamist Militancy, National Security, and the Pakistani State (Oxford University Press, 2016), Dangerous Deterrent: Nuclear Weapons Proliferation and Conflict in South Asia (Stanford University Press, 2007), India, Pakistan, and the Bomb: Debating Nuclear Stability in South Asia (Columbia University Press, 2010), and The Challenges of Nuclear Security: US and Indian Perspectives (Palgrave MacMillan, 2024).
